Spit tobacco is not a quit-smoking solution

Dr. Brad Rodu recommends spit tobacco use as a method to help with smoking cessation (“Smokers need the facts on alternatives,” Ideas, April 19).

This strategy, known as harm reduction, encourages spit tobacco as an alternative to cigarettes because of lower risks for severe health consequences.

Although smoking cessation is very important, spit tobacco is not a safe alternative. There are numerous diseases and illnesses that have been scientifically linked to spit tobacco, including gingivitis, tooth decay, cardiovascular disease and oral, esophageal, pharyngeal, laryngeal, stomach and pancreatic cancer.

The most dangerous of these health issues is oral cancer, which has a mortality rate of 54 percent within five years of diagnosis. The risk for developing oral cancer from spit tobacco has been found to be 14 times greater than the risk in nonusers.

Besides the health risks associated with the use of spit tobacco, there are other concerns with harm reduction. There could be an increase in use among adolescents who think “smokeless is harmless” when it comes to spit tobacco, an overall increase in the use of tobacco by nonusers, and an increase in sales of high-nicotine products that raise the risk for addiction.

In his research, Dr. Rodu has often discussed the effectiveness of harm-reduction programs in Sweden. While Swedish studies have indeed demonstrated decreased smoking levels through the use of spit tobacco, there are several differences between the two countries that make it difficult to compare the United States to Sweden.

First of all, the spit tobacco products are dramatically different. The levels of cancer-causing agents found in Swedish spit tobacco brands are dramatically lower (by as much as 98 percent). Sweden also has a rigorous system of controls over manufacturing and advertising of spit tobacco products. The United States has no regulatory control over spit tobacco and very few restrictions on advertising. The United States and Sweden are not similar when it comes to spit tobacco products and should not be compared for harm reduction purposes.

Dr. Rodu also states that the British Royal College of Physicians has endorsed spit tobacco use for smoking cessation. However, professor John Britton, chairman of the RCP tobacco advisory group, states, “The best thing that a smoker can do for his or her health is to quit all smoking and nicotine use completely. Nicotine products like the patch and gum deliver necessary amounts of the drug to overcome addiction withdrawal without any of the risks of tobacco use.” There are clinically proven options available that do not include any increased risk of cancer that should be utilized rather than other forms of tobacco.

Finally, the author neglected to mention his vested interest in the use of spit tobacco. Dr. Rodu is an endowed professor of tobacco harm reduction. Dr. Rodu’s position at the university and his line of research are directly sponsored by grants from the U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Co. (Skoal, Copenhagen) and Swedish Match — two of the largest spit tobacco manufacturers in the world. He has received millions of dollars in grant funding from spit tobacco companies and has acted as an expert witness for them in product liability lawsuits.

Given the uncertainties associated with Dr. Rodu’s strategy, the World Health Organization and other public health groups have determined that the overall risks associated with spit tobacco do not support the use of a harm reduction strategy.

Decreasing the smoking levels in North Carolina and the United States is very important from a health standpoint. But there are ways that this can be achieved without recommending spit tobacco. We need to decrease tobacco use, period, not replace one tobacco product with another.

Source: News-record

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • SphereIt
  • Simpy
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Propeller

Tags:

One Response to “Spit tobacco is not a quit-smoking solution”

  1. A wonderful article…. In my life, I have never seen a man be so selfless in helping others around him to get along and get working. I feel good that there are people like you too. Thanks for this great weblog of yours. Its surely going to get me to go to higher places!

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

stop
quit cigs

Famous quotes

The only ’safer’ cigarette is your last one.
Duane Alan Hahn .................................
You own yourself, so if you want to do something that destroys yourself, go ahead. Just don’t harm others when you do.
Jim Goebel .................................
To see what is right, and not do it, is want of courage, or of principle.
Confucius .................................
If you resolve to give up smoking, drinking and loving, you don’t actually live longer; it just seems longer.
Clement Freud .................................
Smoking is a custom loathsome to the eye, hateful to the nose, harmful to the brain, dangerous to the lungs, and in the black, stinking fume thereof nearest resembling the horrible Stygian smoke of the pit that is bottomless.
King James I of England .................................
Smoking kills. If you’re killed, you’ve lost a very important part of your life.
Brooke Shields .................................
I’ll tell you why I like the cigarette business. It cost a penny to make. Sell it for a dollar. It’s addictive. And there’s a fantastic brand loyalty.
Warren Buffett .................................
If you resolve to give up smoking, drinking and loving, you don’t actually live longer; it just seems longer.
Clement Freud .................................
Giving up smoking is the easiest thing in the world. I know because I’ve done it thousands of times.
Mark Twain
quit